From: Robert Vasquez <digital DOT fx AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Allegro
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 06:07:00 -0500
Organization: Digital Fx
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <33293154.6821@worldnet.att.net>
References: <01bc2de8$4375fdc0$89ae71a5 AT mod DOT exo DOT com>
	 <01bc2ef3$f2193480$8a081ecb AT sly> <332833f0 DOT 560019 AT news DOT ping DOT be> <g0cLqQAv4aKzEwDX AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.147.60.105
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Shawn Hargreaves wrote:
> 
> Dominique Biesmans writes:
> >Didn't a very early version of Allegro compile under BC? (version 1.X
> >whatever ...) Shawn probably had a good reason to drop the borland
> >version ;-)
> 
> Yup. Prior to v2, Allegro could be used with both Borland and djgpp. I
> can dig out the old code if anyone is interterested, but it was very
> primitive (look through the changes.txt file, subtract everything that
> has been added over the years, and you'll realise that there isn't a lot
> left...)
> 
> As to why I dropped the Borland support: I hate writing 16 bit code and
> never want to go anywhere near that stupid memory architecture ever
> again :-)

What about 32 bit borland? Same memory model as djgpp right? pmode?

-- 
               Rob Vasquez
               Digital Fx '97
               
   email:   digital DOT fx AT worldnet DOT att DOT net