Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 12:37:30 +0100 (MET)
From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku AT gilberto DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Message-Id: <199703111137.MAA07444@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: dpmi_int - any caveats (again)

DJGPP V2.01, CWSDPMI V0.90+ (r3)

Could there be any cach flushing effects when using 
farpeek(), farpoke() and dpmi_int?

E.g. that a realmode driver sees a certain memory location
to be zero while a different value is passed to protected mode?

Just wild guessing but I have such an effect. It might as well be
a problem of that real mode driver (which I don't have the sources for.
The company that has written it, doesn't supply the sources);

--
Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku AT gil DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de