From: enigma AT erols DOT com (enigma)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: c.o.m.djgpp retro-moderated?
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:23:08 GMT
Organization: djgpp, i luv u ;)
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <331b6ae3.17041763@news.erols.com>
References: <199703022040 DOT PAA22429 AT delorie DOT com> <slrn5hk6gm DOT hma DOT nxk3 AT dante DOT student DOT cwru DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dam-as3s56.erols.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On 3 Mar 1997 00:24:28 GMT, nxk3 AT dante DOT student DOT cwru DOT edu (Natarajan
Krishnaswami) wrote:

>On Sun, 2 Mar 1997 20:40:01 GMT, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone interested in discussing the idea of switching the
>> comp.os.msdos.djgpp newsgroup from "unmoderated" to "retro-moderated"
>> status? 
>
>Since this newsgroup is also a mailing list, I think it would be most
>worthwhile to consider moderating it.
>
>If this were only available as a newsgroup, I would be more hesitant,
>as a killfile might be more appropriate, but since it's not... 
>
>IMO, YMMV, etc.
>
>
>N.,
>who is amused that the signature randomizer picked the anti-censorship 
>quote for this message.
>-- 
>"As good almost kill a man as kill a good book; who kills a man kills
> a reasonable creature, God's image; but he who destroys a good book
> kills reason itself"
>			-John Milton, "Areopagitica"
D00ds.. d00ds .. d00ds... this group rocks.. programming is all that
is discussed, flat memory model at that.. i've never seen any problems
with off thread talk (haha.. what a paradox in terms).  moderated
would only slow the message recieved rates.  why cause people to delay
the recieval of their much anticipated mail?  cool? cool...

mint
enigma AT erols DOT com