From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Docs on Arpanet
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 19:59:27 -0800
Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <3313B51F.742C@cs.com>
References: <199702251320 DOT NAA08403 AT re DOT tsu DOT tomsk DOT su>
Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp206.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Zibarev Denis wrote:
> 
> PS. (About djgpp optimization): Does anybody know about the result
> of djgpp optimization (in comp. with WATCOM C/C++ V10.0).

In general, DJGPP produces code that is both faster and smaller than
with any other 32-bit compiler, minus the overhead of the startup code. 
The FAQ (v2/faq210b.zip from SimTel) has a lot of information about this
in the beginning chapters.

Sorry, I can't help you with the other thing though.  :)

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| John M. Aldrich, aka Fighteer I  |        fighteer AT cs DOT com         |
| "Starting flamewars since 1993"  |   http://www.cs.com/fighteer   |
|  *** NOTICE ***  This .signature is generated randomly.           |
|                  If you don't like it, sue my computer.           |
---------------------------------------------------------------------