From: nikki AT gameboutique DOT co (nikki) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: directx? for djgpp (sort of :) Date: 25 Feb 1997 09:29:08 GMT Organization: GameBoutique Ltd. Lines: 43 Message-ID: <5eubd4$296@flex.uunet.pipex.com> References: <19A218A3372 AT csd DOT inp DOT nsk DOT su> <5ef2b5$k3e AT flex DOT uunet DOT pipex DOT com> <330B4BCF DOT 4DA0 AT rpi DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: www.gameboutique.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp > I'm not a windows weenie, so don't flame me, but Windows does offer more > than > just video card support. By abstracting the video, sound, input (mouse > and > keyboard) subsystems, programmers are insulated from all of those > aspects. well true, but then allegro already provides quite adequate support for these sort of devices :) > Remember when games were written that REQUIRED you to have a Creative > Labs > Soundblaster? Hmmm, there monopoly sure went the the way of the hula > hoop. erm. i thought the monopoly was with those dreaded gravis ultrasound things. well anyway point taken. nothing pissed me off more than being told by my application that it wasn't going to run because my sound card wasn't good enough and i should go buy a decent soundcard. > Windows did it. I own an Ensoniq Soundscape now, and no one in the > world, > except the guys at Ensoniq that write the layer between my card and the > DirectX/Windows sound system need to know a thing about that card. Sure, i thought you were gonna say noone in the world owns one except you for a moment ;) heh just kidding. > windows has drawbacks, but it's really hard to claim this is one of > them. It's > probably the biggest benefit. indeedly so. hence having access to some of these goodies from dos would be kinda nice. ideally i'd like to see dos with at least most of the capabilities of windows because i find such os's restrictive and non-intuitive. regards, nik -- Graham Tootell nikki AT gameboutique DOT com