From: Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: delete NULL?
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:19:18 -0800
Organization: Alcyone Systems
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <33114F06.7F1D6994@alcyone.com>
References: <2 DOT 2 DOT 32 DOT 19970217010047 DOT 00686a98 AT mailhost> <19970217 DOT 174351 DOT 7567 DOT 1 DOT fwec AT juno DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Mark T Logan wrote:

> Thank you for your reply.  However, I have one question.  If NULL always
> equals
> 0 in C++, why shouldn't I use NULL?

He's saying that the null pointer is always 0 in C++.  The preprocessor
macro NULL possibly may not be.

-- 
       Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email:  max AT alcyone DOT com
                     Alcyone Systems /    web:  http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, California, United States /    icbm:  37 20 07 N  121 53 38 W
                                   \
              "I am become death, / destroyer of worlds."
                                 / J. Robert Oppenheimer (quoting legend)