From: sime AT fly DOT cc DOT fer DOT hr (Simun Mikecin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: flops...
Date: 7 Feb 1997 12:13:38 GMT
Organization: etf
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5df69i$m5g@bagan.srce.hr>
References: <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 94 DOT 970206191432 DOT 20961C-100000 AT taz> <32FB0860 DOT EE1 AT cornell DOT edu>
Reply-To: sime AT fly DOT cc DOT etf DOT hr
NNTP-Posting-Host: fly.cc.etf.hr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

A. Sinan Unur (asu1 AT cornell DOT edu) wrote:
: check out http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/index.html, especially
: http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/linpack-pc.c

: it would be nice to compare the results given there for watcom compiled
: version on p100 with djgpp's performance. however, it should probably be
: done by someone who knows both watcom and djgpp optimization options so
: that comparable results can be achieved.

I tried it on a Am486DX4-120. Results are:

  Watcom C 10.5a (PMODE/W): 5.40 MFLOPS
  DJGPP 2.01    (PMODE/DJ): 5.45 MFLOPS

                                          <E-mail:     sime AT fly DOT cc DOT fer DOT hr    >
                                          <2nd E-mail: simun DOT mikecin AT fer DOT hr  >
                                          <URL:    http://fly.cc.fer.hr/~sime>