From: dpsm AT en DOT com (Dale P. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: 4DOS vs. bash
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 14:58:44 GMT
Organization: RheoActive
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <32f0134d.3272925@usenet.en.com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970127190310 DOT 2047F-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Reply-To: dpsm AT en DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: p16-ts4.en.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT sympatico DOT ca> wrote:

>I use 4DOS in DOS, and bash in Linux.  I also use bash in DOS, but not
>as a primary shell.  I use bash in DOS only for script programming and
>for use with a few makefiles.

Same here.  I couldn't live in dos without 4dos.  Don't forget that if
you "SET .SH=c:\djgpp2\bin\bash.exe" and all your shell scripts end in
.sh, 4dos will call bash automagically.

Dale
-- 
Dale P. Smith
dpsm AT en DOT com          home
rheo AT rheoactive DOT com  work