From: pgrieb AT netusa1 DOT net (Perry Grieb) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: OpenDOS to be released next week! Date: 19 Jan 1997 08:48:57 GMT Organization: RedHat Linux User Lines: 24 Distribution: usa Message-ID: <5bsn5p$95e@news.netusa1.net> References: <5bqhnt$q87 AT lyra DOT csx DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: indyk42.netusa1.net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |> Problem 1: The boot sector loads the kernel so to boot from the opendos |> kernel, it would have to be called something else instead of MSDOS.SYS and |> IO.SYS. I assume it will be DRDOS.SYS and DRIO.SYS or OPENDOS.SYS, |> OPENIO.SYS. However this still leaves the problem of the bootsector |> loading the kernel. Looks like we're going to be installing LILO or some |> other boot manager. |> |> That brings me to a question I've been wanting to ask now for quite some |> time. What bootloaders are out there that are better than LILO? I hate |> LILO because it is too simple, plain and unfriendly. I'd prefer a WHITE |> on BLUE menu to pop up that lists all installed OS's. Comments? I haven't used this boot loader yet, but there is one at the following address that is under the GNU GPL. It is advertised as having a menu type interface. http://www.uruk.org/grub/ A long time ago, I say something called osbs or something similar. I recall it as having a simple menu. FreeBSD has a loader. So there are several floating around. Some may not be to your liking. Perry