From: Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: assembler
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 17:37:53 -0800
Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <32C9BFF1.42FF@cam.org>
References: <32C7CD0C DOT 5B96 AT netime DOT com>
Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamicppp-174.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

derek greene wrote:
> 
> has anyone that does the work on djgpp ever thought about implementing
> intel syntax? this at&t thing is a pain in the butt, it never compiles
> it for me and it is starting to piss me off
That would be *impossible* to do because djgpp is just a port of unix's
gcc to dos(with some enhancements) and gcc uses AT&T syntax.If you would
cange the syntax,the programs wouldn't compile under other gcc's on
other systems.
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
http://www.cam.org/~tudor

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d-(--) s(-):(+) a? C+ UL>++++ P L>+++++ E- W++ N o K---(----) w---
O---- M-- V-? PS+++ PE Y PGP t+ 5-- X+++>++++ R tv b+ DI D+ G e->++
h>++ r- y>+++++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------