From: Elliott Oti <e DOT oti AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Which is faster? Allegro or Sandmann's LFB
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 02:51:04 -0800
Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht, (ACCU)
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <32C3AA18.1B6E@stud.warande.ruu.nl>
References: <59s2q3$84l AT nuscc DOT nus DOT sg> <19961226 DOT 230751 DOT 4975 DOT 3 DOT chambersb AT juno DOT com> <32C33E38 DOT 1F5D AT cam DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: warande1078.warande.ruu.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Tudor wrote:
> The allegro demo game goes at about 500 fps on my pentium 133,16 mb ram,
> 800x600 or 640x480 resolution.
> Anyway,is it right that the fps values are the same for both 800x600 and
> 640x480 resolutions?

With dirty rectangles the speed of the demo is indeed roughly constant, 
limited by the speed of your video card -- try mode 13h, it'll give
roughly the same number of fps.
E