To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Need "fancy" trick...
Message-ID: <19961226.233626.4983.3.chambersb@juno.com>
References: Conversation 
	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 961223223553 DOT 2067D-100000 AT web DOT wa DOT net> with last 
	message <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961226081853 DOT 6244D-100000 AT is>
	<MAPI DOT Id DOT 0016 DOT 00656e65622020203030303530303035 AT mapi DOT to DOT rfc822>
From: chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 02:32:05 EST


On Wed, 25 Dec 96 22:33:52 PST Gene Buckle <geneb AT web DOT wa DOT net> writes:
[big snip]
>Eli, my understanding of system() and the spawn() functions leads me 
>to =
>belive that the program that issues those calls could be swapped out 
>of =
>memory.  This would be VERY bad.  If that is not the case, I'm still 
>susp=
>icious.  It's just _too_ easy of a solution. ;)
>
Why not just lock the memory?  That way, it never get's swapped to disk. 
Hurts the available memory, but works.

...Chambers