From: timolmst AT cyberramp DOT net
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: gcc compiles so slow?
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 1996 16:36:45 GMT
Organization: CyberRamp.net, Dallas, TX (214) 340-2020/(817) 226-2020 for info
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <59h3dj$23r$1@newshost.cyberramp.net>
References: <199612171748 DOT MAA13875 AT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pm4-16.cyberramp.net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>You can't extrapolate from such a small sample (one test).  You need
>to compile a larger source also to determine what the static overhead
>is.  For example, Borland might be 0.1 sec/line, but DJGPP might be
>0.05 sec/line plus 8 seconds of overhead.

I think you're all missing the important point here. What diffference
does it make? I can't tel thedifference between 0.1 sec/line and 0.05
sec/line. It's no big deal. Try asking Borland, or Microsuck, for free
tech support! They'll just ask you what kind of funny plant vapors
you've been smoking.