From: "Weiqi Gao" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: dos data segment Date: 21 Dec 1996 03:41:32 GMT Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access Lines: 23 Message-ID: <01bbeef0$c1497880$0f0171a5@weiqigao> References: <32B9FB24 DOT 2696 AT cam DOT org> <32BA5130 DOT 6E3E AT cs DOT com> <59e5b8$k26 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: crl2.crl.com To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Ruiter de M wrote in article <59e5b8$k26 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl>... > [earlier discussion about plura;ity of "data"] > Yes. And all of this is very off-topic. Sorry for joining the discussion here. From The Dictionary of Modern English Usage by H.W. Fowler (you can guess that I'm not a native English speaker, why else would anyone keep such a dictionary): \bold{data} is a latin plural (\italics{The d. are}, not \italics{is, insufficient.} / \italics{What are the d.?} / \italics{We have no d.}); the singular, relatively rare, is \italics{datum}; \italics{one of the data} is commoner than \italics{a datum}; but \italics{datum-line}, is used for a line taken as a basis. Latin plurals sometimes become singular English words (e.g. \italics{agenda, stanima}) and \italics{data} is often so treated in the U.S.; in Britain this is still considered a solecism, though it may occationally appear. -- Weiqi Gao weiqigao AT crl DOT com