Sender: root AT sympatico DOT ca
Message-ID: <32A6CAB0.51E99356@sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 08:14:24 -0500
From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT sympatico DOT ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "A. Kunigelis" <algikun AT santaka DOT sc-uni DOT ktu DOT lt>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Idea for powerful IDE
References: <32A0FD87 DOT 66AA AT nlc DOT net DOT au> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 961202140812 DOT 26360F-100000 AT santaka DOT sc-uni DOT ktu DOT lt>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

A. Kunigelis wrote:
> 
> >
> >       Considering people are thinking of porting RHIDE to Win95/97..
> >
> 
> Is that really true??? How come people keep talking about what crapp
> Windows is and then still put effort in it??? Why isn't porting RHIDE to
> Linux a primary project? Linux definitely needs a good IDE for gcc,
> because the old WPE is.. old? And there's a version of TurboVision for
> Linux, too!

Agreed, XWPE is not that great.  When doing Native linux programming, I
usually use 'joe' for editing, or I run BOXER in DOSemu (it lets you
save UNIX text files).  However a GOOD IDE for Text mode and X is
definately needed!!!!!!!!!  XWPE in any carnation *LOCKS HARD* on my
machine.

Mike