From: bdarnell AT vnet DOT net (Ben Darnell) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Future of Allegro (?) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 21:13:18 GMT Organization: Vnet Internet Access, Inc. Lines: 26 Message-ID: <56g1ti$3ii@ralph.vnet.net> References: <56eaj0$ap2 AT catapult DOT gatech DOT edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: vts-char7-s4.vnet.net To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp gt4558a AT acmex DOT gatech DOT edu (Rubicant) was overheard mumbling incoherently about Future of Allegro (?): >2) More importantly, Allegro is basically stuck where it is. Mind you, >it's got ALOT of functionality and great features as it is, but for it to >remain as is is a shame. What do the rest of you think of someone >temporarily taking over the maintanance of Allegro till we hear from Shawn >again? I can't do it personally (Shawn was a much better coder than I >currently am), but I do think it would be beneficial - Allegro is quite >popular and useful. Would anyone be interested in making unofficial >Allegro releases? Do any of you think that Shawn would mind? (I'm >guessing not) I volunteer to take over the maintainance. I don't have time to add many new features, but I can upload new versions so we don't have to hear about bank.s anymore ;). In fact, I'll be uploading a new version to x2ftp in a few minutes. If anyone has any proposals for new features, email me. __ __ /> /_ /| / /\ /| /> /| / /_ / / /> /_ / |/ /_/ /-| / \ / |/ /_ /_ /_ http://users.vnet.net/bdarnell bdarnell AT vnet DOT net