From: michael_sweeney AT videoway DOT com (Michael Sweeney)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Future of Allegro (?)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:40:42
Organization: videoway.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <michael_sweeney.15.0009ADEF@videoway.com>
References: <56eaj0$ap2 AT catapult DOT gatech DOT edu> <56f93d$n8 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.237.232.207
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <56f93d$n8 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot) writes:
>From: mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (George Foot)
>Subject: Re: Future of Allegro (?)
>Date: 14 Nov 1996 14:07:41 GMT


>I don't think Shawn would mind because the license of Allegro explicitly 
>allows you to do whatever you want with it. There is a wish list included 
>in alleg21.zip, so yes, maybe someone could organize a project to get it 
>all done. And also add support for new hardware, etc... Or maybe it would 
>be better just to do new things, because by now he's probably done all 
>those on the wishlist.

I know I would like to see support for the Waveblaster put into Allegro.... 
(my wish list)