Message-ID: <32720C6A.53F0@ananke.amu.edu.pl>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:04:42 +0200
From: Mark Habersack <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Reply-To: grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
Organization: home, sweet home
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Weeks <pweeks AT mercury DOT execulink DOT com>
CC: Gautier DOT deMontmollin AT Maths DOT UniNe DOT CH, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Is djgpp better than Watcom C?
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961018104724 DOT 3677A-100000 AT aditya DOT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in> <1996Oct24 DOT 103643 DOT 5298 AT news> <32713240 DOT 5DC2AC75 AT mercury DOT execulink DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jeff Weeks wrote:
> 
> > >> >Advantage djgpp: fastest-growing Dos compiler around.
> > >> >For the rest they're pretty much the same.
> > >>
> > >> Result:
> > >>    DJGPP    WATCOM
> > >>      1   :    0
> >
> > DOOM was compiled with Watcom, QUAKE with DJGPP...
> 
> And DJGPP programs are very easily ported to UNIX!  A very big plus in
> my books!
> 
> Results:
> DJGPP  WATCOM
>   3      0
> 
> Looks like DJGPP wins :)

With one compiler you can produce programs for three OSs: DOS, Win95 &
WinNT.
And all this functionality takes 70% less disk space than with Borland,
Watcom or M$ compilers.

Results:
  DJGPP  WATCOM
    4      0

I wonder how many points is DJGPP going to get?

-- 
============================================================================
She nervously undressed in the dancing beams of the Fidra lighthouse
Giving it all away before it's too late. She'll let her lover's tongue
move in a warm wet circle, giving it all away and showing no shame.
She'll take her mother's kiss on her first broken heart, a warm wet
circle,
she'll realise that she plays her part in a warm wet circle...
====================== http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel
===================