From: Jeff Weeks <pweeks AT mercury DOT execulink DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is djgpp better than Watcom C?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 17:33:52 -0400
Organization: Code X software
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <32713240.5DC2AC75@mercury.execulink.com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 961018104724 DOT 3677A-100000 AT aditya DOT unigoa DOT ernet DOT in> <1996Oct24 DOT 103643 DOT 5298 AT news>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp1.saturn.execulink.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Gautier DOT deMontmollin AT Maths DOT UniNe DOT CH
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> >> >Advantage djgpp: fastest-growing Dos compiler around.
> >> >For the rest they're pretty much the same.
> >>
> >> Result:
> >>    DJGPP    WATCOM
> >>      1   :    0
> 
> DOOM was compiled with Watcom, QUAKE with DJGPP...

And DJGPP programs are very easily ported to UNIX!  A very big plus in
my books!

Results:
DJGPP  WATCOM
  3      0

Looks like DJGPP wins :)


Jeff