Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Alaric B. Williams" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 18:43:28 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: DJGPP V2.01 Released Message-ID: <846263987.18931.0@abwillms.demon.co.uk> On 24 Oct 96 at 9:17, Hartmut Schirmer wrote: > > I've got V2.00 patched on my web server anyway, so I could do that > > when I D/L V2.01 at last! > > > > It'll be in "http://www.abwillms.demon.co.uk/prog/" > > Did anybody thougt about including the > > 'Bounds Checking for C' > (see http://www-ala.doc.ic.ac.uk/~phjk/BoundsChecking.html) > option in a DJGPP build compiler? Most time I just turn around and > around > to find those little stupid errors accessing arrays, dynamic chains, ... Hmmm, anybody have any opinions? I don't want to end up with a superfat everything included version, simply because many people just want things like the section attribute fixed. I certainly won't put in the Pentium patch, since I don't have a pentium, and I wouldn't be happy about putting something on the page I can't fully test! > Development would be much easier and the final program would benefit a > lot > from this option. A stable program with fast (and may be complicated) > algorithms will beat any optimizer, IMHO. Well, if everyone wants it in there, I'll put it in. At the moment, I'm only planning on applying the attribute ((section)) patch. ABW -- Governments are merely protection rackets with good images. Alaric B. Williams Internet : alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk http://www.abwillms.demon.co.uk/