Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 21:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Patrick <pjenki1 AT gl DOT umbc DOT edu>
To: Leath Muller <leathm AT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au>
cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Using Djgpp Windows NT
In-Reply-To: <326ACFD2.7E60@gbrmpa.gov.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.961020214945.3216A-100000@rpc42.gl.umbc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Leath Muller wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 1996, Jeffrey P Hanzlik wrote:
> > 
> > > Ok, it appears as though the componets ie cpp, cc1 ... work correctly
> > > but the driver program gcc.exe does not.  gcc.exe mearly returns with
> > > not action taking place indpendent of the command arguments provided.
> > 
> > Are you sure you don't have an old version of gcc?  Can you please post
> > the sizes and timestamps of gcc.exe, cpp.exe and cc1.exe?
> > 
> > What does go32-v2 print when invoked with no arguments from the DOS box?
> 
> Actually, what version of NT is he running? I have found that NT 4.0
> doesn't like gcc... :(  NT 3.51 doesnt seem to have too much trouble, 
> but 4.0 seems to spew in a major way.
> 
> I wrote the simplest program I could under 4.0 (hello world proggy), and
> even it barfed... does anyone else have NT 4.0 who can verify/disagree
> with this?
> 
> Leathal.
> 
I have NT 4.0 workstation (build 1381 - shrinkwrapped) and I have had no
problems.  I haven't upgraded to 2.01 yet, but I have been using 2.0
without any problems for about 2 1/2-3 weeks!  djgpp is NOT on an NTFS
drive.  It is on a Fat drive.


     "When you park, don't drink.  Accidents cause people."  - Wise Man
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Patrick L. Jenkins     |  E-Mail: pjenki1 AT gl DOT umbc DOT edu
      XSIV Software          |  WWW:    http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~pjenki1/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------