From: Elliott Oti <e DOT oti AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Is djgpp better than Watcom C?
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 09:02:58 -0700
Organization: Academic Computer Centre Utrecht, (ACCU)
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <32650732.101F@stud.warande.ruu.nl>
References: <01bbbb69$25b500c0$7c1060c6 AT default>
NNTP-Posting-Host: warande1078.warande.ruu.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Ian Mausolus wrote:
> 
> I'd like to know if DJGPP is better/superior to Watcom C, and if you think
> it is why?  I'm considering switching but only if it is actually worth it!

Switch? Go ahead and try them both, if you already have Watcom; djgpp is 
free. With a little careful coding and a few #ifdefs you can write code that
will compile on both. Aside from inline asm and interrupt handlers the two
work pretty much the same.
Advantage Watcom: you can program for Windows too.
Advantage djgpp: fastest-growing Dos compiler around.
For the rest they're pretty much the same.