From: jimrush AT indirect DOT com (Jim Rush)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: HELP:could not read symbols: Memory exhausted(povray 3.0)
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1996 02:23:22 GMT
Organization: GoodNet
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <53f6s2$15g4@news.goodnet.com>
References: <539qjt$17qc AT news DOT goodnet DOT com>  <3258D9F3 DOT 418D AT pobox DOT oleane DOT com> <NEWTNews DOT 844788760 DOT 31555 DOT mwallace AT celsius-tul>
NNTP-Posting-Host: phx-ts2-5.goodnet.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

One or two quick traces comparing a DJGPP version vs the MSDOS
distributed version showed that the DJGPP version was 7% slower.  I've
been trying to get the Pentium patches to work with the DJGPP version
of GCC, but haven't gotten past some of the basic patch issues.  Has
anybody already got a running version of the PGCC that they could send
me (executable is fine, I don't have to have the source).

Jim
jimrush AT indirect DOT com

mwallace AT skyler DOT wiltel DOT com wrote:


>Does Povray run any faster when compiled by DJGPP instead
>of Borland?

>Mike