From: Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: protected and public  base classes
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 22:21:34 -0700
Organization: Alcyone Systems
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <323CE3DE.3CA7112B@alcyone.com>
References: <51frft$9qk AT miracle DOT cybernex DOT net> <designDxroL9 DOT sx AT netcom DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.alcyone.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Chris Waters wrote:

> Since there is, as yet, no ansi standard for C++, the question about
> djgpp's conformance is meaningless.  Unless you're asking about
> conformance with the C standard.  :)

Nonsense.  There are very explicit draft standards that are currently under
review for an official ANSI standard.

-- 
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE   http://www.alcyone.com/max/   max AT alcyone DOT com
San Jose, California   ICBM 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W   R^4: the 4th R is respect
"Gods are born and die, but the atom endures."              -- Alexander Chase