Xref: news2.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:3980
From: Shawn Hargreaves <slh100 AT york DOT ac DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Bugs in CWSDPMI and FSDB
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 21:51:36 +0100
Organization: The University of York, UK
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960517215020.432A-100000@tower.york.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tower.york.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960517143820.21695A-100000@tower.york.ac.uk>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Thu, 16 May 1996, A.Appleyard wrote:

> Like I said, djgpp should have stayed independent of non-Gnu DPMI's 
> and theirgs and oddities; on entry it should have exited from any 
> existing protected mode to real mode and then had within itself its 
> own DPMI-equivalent.

Jeez, you don't half go on and on about the same idea :-)

What you suggest is _not possible_. No way. Under Win 3.1, Win-95, 
Win-NT, OS-2, Linux dosemu, and just about any other OS out there except 
plain DOS, you _can't_ get rid of the DPMI, no matter how much you might 
want to. Under djgpp 1.x you couldn't get rid of it either: that's why 
go32 programs had trouble doing graphics in windows DOS boxes.


/*
 *	Shawn Hargreaves.        Why is 'phonetic' spelt with a ph?
 *	Check out Allegro and FED on http://www.york.ac.uk/~slh100/
 */