Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:4266
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!bcm.tmc.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!news!sandmann
From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Will DJGPP work on windows 95?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 09:56:38 CST
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <30f53336.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <DL0A5E DOT FA0 AT jade DOT mv DOT net> <4d2jc1$3c4_001 AT tpd DOT tno DOT nl>
Reply-To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

> Ok, but, when I run it, I don't get more than my physical memory.
> For some reason, it does not use virtual memory (which is much more
> than physical, in my case). What did I wrong?

W95 has some bugs in it's DPMI memory management.  You might try defraggin
the disk, or checking the memory with GO32-V2.  I would hope that beta 4
works better in tight memory than beta 3, but I don't have any feedback
on that.  I can use VM on my 16Mb W95 boxes.