Xref: news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:703
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Path: news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.NH.Destek.Net!news2.net99.net!news.cais.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cam.news.pipex.net!pipex!soap.news.pipex.net!pipex!edi.news.pipex.net!pipex!sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk!cs.city.ac.uk!city!sl323
From: sl323 AT city DOT ac DOT uk (Mark Lewis)
Subject: Replacement for inp() and outp() ?
Sender: news AT city DOT ac DOT uk (Unix Network News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: langley
Reply-To: M DOT Lewis AT city DOT ac DOT uk
Organization: The City University
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 95 13:57:48 GMT
Lines: 29
To: djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Borland and/or Miccysoft C define the I/O functions inp() and outp().  Being
primarily a UNIX developer, and certainly not a user of Borland or Miccysoft
C, I'm not familiar with these functions.  DJGPP defines 3 similar functions
in libpc.a (namely inportb(), inportw(), inportl(), along with their
respective output equivalents).  Which of these functions should be used to
accurately duplicate the function of inp() and outp() ?

Thanks in advance,

	Mark.

- --
..--------------------------{ From:  Mark Lewis }--------------------------.
|   Computing Services     |     http://www.city.ac.uk/~sl323/home.html   |
|   City University        |     PGP public key available by WWW, or by   |
|   London,  England       |     fingering sl323 AT finger DOT city DOT ac DOT uk        |
`--------{ M DOT Lewis AT city DOT ac DOT uk (MIME) | nostra AT city DOT ac DOT uk (MIME) }---------'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i

iQCVAgUBL/FhLb+exwC8S2+xAQFUiwP9F/qYAXQYP3jZUCkpTvjf9XPthEIHKXBl
EDYL+GTpdVpz7WETs1Z3nhuF398nCZM7DGrNR8B+4hgzZ2DM3YII6kUGOK+thwE9
LcWnH8iym2ziT1DoomLGFTFJmkYCKZ8HBXjYvRMmyR+cZrB0dFMbBN9K179846RI
1TejGSVrHlU=
=5/10
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----