Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:41:33 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin=ntsec:[no]strict Message-ID: <20030228174133.GD10456@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <3E5F7B1D DOT 935B69A7 AT ieee DOT org> <20030228164519 DOT GA9304 AT redhat DOT com> <3E5F9829 DOT 6540A7F0 AT ieee DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E5F9829.6540A7F0@ieee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Should we have cygcheck run 'id'? > >Yes Ok. I'm adding that now. I'm also going to allow cygwin path names on the command line. That should be helpful. cgf