Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <011f01c2df37$49bb6b50$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: "Pavel Tsekov" <ptsekov AT gmx DOT net>, <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302281021240 DOT 1190-100000 AT moria DOT atlanticsky DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygwin=ntsec:[no]strict
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 14:40:07 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
>>> - The new setup is out, with my ntsec patch. That will greatly
>>>  alleviate the problem you describe in the next paragraph.
>> 
>> I was getting the feeling that Robert thought there was no pressing
>> need for a new setup to be released.  It sounds like this is a
>> pressing need.
> 
> IMO, there is no pressing need to release setup.exe from HEAD - there
> are still bugs in it. Pierre's  patch can be applied on the stable
> branch (setup-200207 i think) though. Then a new 2.249.2.x version of
> setup will be released which cures the permissions problem.

Actually, setup-200207 = 2.259.2.x
          setup-200206 = 2.249.2.x

Max.