Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:40:24 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: uh oh [Roland DOT Schwingel AT onevision DOT de: Re: bash broken with cygwin 1.3.20? - now working with 1.3.20] Message-ID: <20030213144024.GC27226@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Ok, what's causing these type of problems in 1.3.20? There has been a few of these reported. Corinna, Pierre? cgf ----- Forwarded message from Roland Schwingel ----- From: Roland Schwingel To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bash broken with cygwin 1.3.20? - now working with 1.3.20 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:21:03 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Organization: OneVision Software AG In-Reply-To: <3E4B8423 DOT 7030809 AT onevision DOT de> Hello Max (and the list of course) > > mkdir gcc-3.2.1_obj > > cd gcc-3.2.1_obj > > ../gcc-3.2.1/configure > > It fails with > > *** "Can't find configure.in. Try using --srcdir=some_dir" > > Please post the output of 'ls -l ../gcc-3.2.1/configure.in'. -rwx------+ 1 Administ Entwickl 55070 Jul 8 2002 ../gcc-3.2.1-ov/configure.in *BINGO!!!!* Thanks Max... That appears to be the reason! Even I have administrator privileges it is not working with 1.3.20. After chowning it configure works again. The question is what has changed in 1.3.20 that broke this. Or what was broken in 1.3.19 enabling it to work there? (btw. I have ntsec enabled) > > /cygdrive/c/temp/gcc-3.2.1_objc/../gcc-3.2.1 > >>>^<<< > Typo? Or is that exactly what it says? Some kind of both... I need to enable objc. It worked very fine in the past. Additionally we added an additional command to gcc for optimized objc code generation and so we altered some parts of gcc. A made some changes and now need to recompile it. (The changes are far far away of being acceptable by the FSF therefore we did not yet post them to the gcc crew) But here it is a typo. I simplified the pathes in my posting and then made the typo. On my machine I had the correct pathes! Thanks for your help, Roland ----- End forwarded message -----