Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:53:44 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Minor ntsec fixes and optimizations. Message-ID: <20030129175344.GB11143@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20030129123516 DOT 007e4740 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20030129123516.007e4740@mail.attbi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i [redirecting to cygwin-developers since it has nothing to do with the patch] On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:35:16PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >This patch >1) fixes a remaining chown problem, when impersonated >2) combines is_grp_member with get_id, and uses internal_getgroups > in a new way. This makes getting group membership almost free. > This led me to define a new class cygpsid (same as cygsid but without > buffer) and to make minor type changes in security.cc and passwd/group. >3) fixes nits in security.cc > >P.S.: I am getting to the end of my "ntsec to do" list. Next I will >change sec_acl to __{u,g}id32_t. Woo hoo! Btw, do either of you (Pierre, Corinna) have any insight into the recent cygwin mailing list thread where people were complaining about still having ntsec issues? Do you know what that was all about? This was in the "cygwin Release process" thread. cgf