Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: pthreads patches
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Thomas Pfaff <tpfaff AT gmx DOT net>
Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0301092209030.-1109549-100000@thomas.kefrig-pfaff.de>
References: 
	 <Pine DOT WNT DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0301092209030 DOT -1109549-100000 AT thomas DOT kefrig-pfaff DOT de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/tXlTTYiRhKEMI//smOL"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1042148095.13639.529.camel@lifelesslap>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 10 Jan 2003 08:34:55 +1100


--=-/tXlTTYiRhKEMI//smOL
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 08:24, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> I have applied my outstandig patches for pthreads. These are
> pthread_cond_init, pthread_mutex, a patch regarding cancellation and a
> modified version of my pthread types patch (Rob has announced a different
> patch some time ago but never applied it. If he will finish it he might
> revert my patch) plus new mutex tests to the testsuite.
>=20
> The pthread mutex patch will change the mutex default type from recursive
> to errorchecking (all unix systems that i know are either errorchecking o=
r
> fast (deadlocking) by default).
> Any objections ?

None here.

My approach for pthreads patchs is that any that has a test case to
check the behaviour it's modifying is ok to go in after a once-over
eyeball by me - I've had that on all your work to date, and I'm glad to
see the code finally in cygwin.

Any patches that don't have corresponding tests will need much closer
inspection.

Cheers,
Rob

--=20
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

--=-/tXlTTYiRhKEMI//smOL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+Her/I5+kQ8LJcoIRAq+jAJ9HtMuPe6uak0+xaWcXc/k2Ac1uRQCgvgYK
70j2HD5nl6xfzIicVKme23k=
=smSc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-/tXlTTYiRhKEMI//smOL--