Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:33:30 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Avoiding /etc/passwd and /etc/group scans Message-ID: <20021022213330.GK6429@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <3DB58CBD DOT 87B2BDD8 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022181947 DOT GA4729 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5A076 DOT ABAFF076 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022191217 DOT GD4828 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5AB53 DOT B434ED90 AT ieee DOT org> <20021022202004 DOT GA6995 AT redhat DOT com> <20021022203300 DOT GC6429 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5BC04 DOT CD6587CB AT ieee DOT org> <20021022212028 DOT GG6429 AT redhat DOT com> <3DB5C3C4 DOT F57CE7B0 AT ieee DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB5C3C4.F57CE7B0@ieee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:31:48PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Argh. I'd like cygwin to be always able to execute a file with an .exe >> extension. > >Who gets the x right? Everyone? Anyone who can read the file. >> I don't suppose there is any way to do that short of essentially >> doing a chmod +x on the file, right? > >Right. > >About the shell scripts, I will look at you patch tonight. >Why do you want to be different from regular Unix and report x >just because the file starts with #! ? >Why not force the user to chmod +x the scripts, for them to be >executable? I am just trying to minimize the impact on users. For purity sake, I'd rather leave things as they were, actually. cgf