Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change to thread.cc -- need feedback
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20020930151227.GA10898@redhat.com>
References: <20020930151227 DOT GA10898 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-UjXnTkdCQ+i1qLK93v6J"
Date: 01 Oct 2002 06:50:06 +1000
Message-Id: <1033419006.30057.210.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-UjXnTkdCQ+i1qLK93v6J
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 01:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've changed the static declarations in thread.cc to use
> NO_COPY and things seem to be working better in my build.

I've got some confusion going on I think.

Whats the call order during fork of dll_crt0_1, and
MTinterface::fixup_after_fork ()?=20


Rob
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-UjXnTkdCQ+i1qLK93v6J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9mLj+I5+kQ8LJcoIRAt30AKCQ7DGKmWg0e6+2IzvC5Cf2CqKhpQCeJBaF
5YMIm7NLYiJhVGg/GJt1Xu8=
=l+3O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-UjXnTkdCQ+i1qLK93v6J--