Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20020930033001.GC7906@redhat.com>
References: <1033264646 DOT 4375 DOT 78 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929020609 DOT GB11549 AT redhat DOT com> <1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com> <1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com> <1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929165333 DOT 0080fae0 AT mail DOT attbi DOT com>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929224948 DOT 00825140 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com>
	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20020929231122 DOT 0082b170 AT h00207811519c DOT ne DOT client2 DOT attbi DOT com> 
	<20020930033001 DOT GC7906 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-IDFrGdMv5Hz4q1hOdkUJ"
Date: 30 Sep 2002 19:58:19 +1000
Message-Id: <1033379900.30057.180.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-IDFrGdMv5Hz4q1hOdkUJ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 13:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:11:22PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >At 11:10 PM 9/29/2002 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>Hopefully, you've run "make clean" and then "make".  Just to be safe.
> >
> >I had done that this afternoon, after getting the thread.h change,
> >but not tonight.
>=20
> Ok.  Probably not worth doing after just the thread.cc changes.
>=20
> FWIW, I'm seeing this now:
>=20
> "Received a unexpected wait result on mutexInitializationLock -1"
>=20
> sporadically during builds.

Thats 'wait failed'. I'll ecnapsulate the win32 mutex and add a little
extra error info tonight.

Rob
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-IDFrGdMv5Hz4q1hOdkUJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9mCA7I5+kQ8LJcoIRAtTuAJ99XQnVDnNne4Q3JNgQpmd+3NZzeACfchXz
/CA9Xm+0HAqVKxOkC+/7cno=
=WAeR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-IDFrGdMv5Hz4q1hOdkUJ--