Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Many pthread failures in the test suite, one setgroup failure From: Robert Collins To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020930000824.GC27934@redhat.com> References: <20020929020609 DOT GB11549 AT redhat DOT com> <1033265603 DOT 4374 DOT 95 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929022338 DOT GA12659 AT redhat DOT com> <1033267203 DOT 4374 DOT 100 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929024420 DOT GA13416 AT redhat DOT com> <1033271512 DOT 4372 DOT 102 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929141659 DOT GA23836 AT redhat DOT com> <1033309085 DOT 11273 DOT 69 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020929185604 DOT GA25789 AT redhat DOT com> <1033343397 DOT 30057 DOT 167 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020930000824 DOT GC27934 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6uHufaroWnHO4BNZ7Rif" Date: 30 Sep 2002 10:13:12 +1000 Message-Id: <1033344793.11275.169.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-6uHufaroWnHO4BNZ7Rif Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 10:08, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:49:56AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >I've implemented syncronisation around the pthread_mutex initialisation. > >This will not impact performance except for *really badly* written > >programs, as mutex creation is rare. > > > >I still can't reproduce the problem myself, but the changes just checked > >in cause no regressions for the test suite here. > > > >Chris, does this help? >=20 > Actually, it seems to have caused the problem to occur much more now. > I'm rerunning the whole testsuite to see if there are regressions. Urggle. I've got to go do real work for a while. Is there any chance you can give me ssh access to the failing machine? That would let me see and correct the problem in-situ. Rob --=20 --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- --=-6uHufaroWnHO4BNZ7Rif Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9l5cYI5+kQ8LJcoIRAkN0AKCBLKz9hgjGf8bmutMg0IlLB7YuVACfRFq0 m54Dq6XjYnYe7zFSuYIbeOE= =rsoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6uHufaroWnHO4BNZ7Rif--