Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Recent change to init.cc for thread detach looks wrong?
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20020920053205.GA20330@redhat.com>
References: <20020920053205 DOT GA20330 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-YRgCRF9zOZqOQaiweEec"
Date: 20 Sep 2002 17:02:51 +1000
Message-Id: <1032505371.9116.39.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-YRgCRF9zOZqOQaiweEec
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 15:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Robert,
> Your recent change:
> 2002-09-11  Robert Collins  <rbtcollins AT hotmail DOT com>
>=20
>         * init.cc (dll_entry): On thread detach, if the thread hasn't
>         exit()ed, do so.
>=20
> doesn't look right.  The code invokes pthread::exit which can block
> waiting on a mutex, it seems.

Ok, will correct this weekend.

Rob


--=-YRgCRF9zOZqOQaiweEec
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9isgaI5+kQ8LJcoIRAiMHAKDLtARVpcP4yMYsf60ocbbp6bl/iACffJyl
zIwiSdWn5ciNGI7qeaWzHKQ=
=rOAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-YRgCRF9zOZqOQaiweEec--