Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygserver merge From: Robert Collins To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Conrad Scott In-Reply-To: <3D89C95B.46FD6E99@yahoo.com> References: <00f001c25f4b$6a01bd40$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <1032384055 DOT 17676 DOT 254 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020918213840 DOT GE10913 AT redhat DOT com> <00e901c25fbe$3fe32170$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D89C95B DOT 46FD6E99 AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-10BOLplC8IRwVFtWKPTH" Date: 19 Sep 2002 23:02:57 +1000 Message-Id: <1032440579.9116.9.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-10BOLplC8IRwVFtWKPTH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 22:55, Earnie Boyd wrote: > Conrad Scott wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > > Also, please make sure that GNU coding standards are still being met. > >=20 > > I'll check this through this evening: I think I've been conformant but > > I'll double check. > >=20 >=20 > As an exercise of your double check you may wish to: >=20 > cvs diff -u3pN -r HEAD -r cygserver You should use cvsmkpatch to get the difference between the cygserver branch and HEAD. This is because of the merge tracking, you will get incorrect results otherwise. Cheers, Rob --=-10BOLplC8IRwVFtWKPTH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9icsBI5+kQ8LJcoIRAswDAJ98MF8bGka1cxAmEXv7TD60IPBBOACeI68O rSITGnnXw7aR5CghBOf3bwQ= =2IXD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-10BOLplC8IRwVFtWKPTH--