Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygserver merge
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Conrad Scott <Conrad DOT Scott AT dsl DOT pipex DOT com>
Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <00f001c25f4b$6a01bd40$6132bc3e@BABEL>
References: <00f001c25f4b$6a01bd40$6132bc3e AT BABEL>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-XOYkmnz92im5DR5vkEAa"
Date: 19 Sep 2002 07:20:54 +1000
Message-Id: <1032384055.17676.254.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0


--=-XOYkmnz92im5DR5vkEAa
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 05:41, Conrad Scott wrote:

> Any votes either way?


I'm of the release-early-and-often camp. I vote to merge up.

Rob


--=-XOYkmnz92im5DR5vkEAa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9iO42I5+kQ8LJcoIRAoycAKCsuFHs0r+gsEQT0BJj3WHhsI+algCfXY7Q
KV2a6eMEwuk62eVkTJOYrZ0=
=RTpt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-XOYkmnz92im5DR5vkEAa--