Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D459CEC.35B29D99@ieee.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:52:12 -0400 From: "Pierre A. Humblet" X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Conrad Scott CC: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: TCP problems References: <010901c23724$96e5d430$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D4581E4 DOT BB580995 AT ieee DOT org> <005801c23730$02304170$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D459257 DOT 240C79DC AT ieee DOT org> <009c01c23736$4a61a4b0$6132bc3e AT BABEL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Conrad Scott wrote: > > > It's a really simple server: blocking accept, > > > read/write on the new file descriptor, then shutdown/close it > and > > > back to a blocking accept. And it still hits the WASENOBUFS > wall > > > eventually (altho' it can be delayed by registry patches to > > > increase various TCP parameters). > > > > How long/how many accepts (more or less) is "eventually". > > On my lovely little win98/SE box: one hundred connections minus a > few. On my Win98 the exim mail server accepts hundreds of connections (over hours, days and weeks) without problems.... One hundred is about the default max # simultaneous tcp connections. Does netstat -an show them, e.g. in TIME_WAIT? If they happen in a short time (minutes) you may be hitting the default linger timeout. Have you tried setting linger ON with a 0 timeout? > Nicholas Wourms (my (un)willing test accomplice) reported "~3 > minutes" of run time before hitting the same error: so he's > getting a thousand or so (?) connections by the sounds of it. Win98 or ME? If it's ME that reminds of the Xserver problem we had a year ago. Pierre