Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 15:20:37 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: TCP problems Message-ID: <20020729192037.GA19335@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <010901c23724$96e5d430$6132bc3e AT BABEL> <3D4581E4 DOT BB580995 AT ieee DOT org> <005801c23730$02304170$6132bc3e AT BABEL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005801c23730$02304170$6132bc3e@BABEL> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 07:44:44PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >The idea would be to detect the last close of a given socket >system wide; so it wouldn't matter whether the parent or child or >whatever was the last to close the socket. If you're just talking about system-wide closes then you could use the technique currently employed in pipe.cc where events are used as flags indicating when the "other side" of a pipe is closed. cgf