Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D37F0E5.50F3669B@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 06:58:45 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin hang problem References: <3D32FC00 DOT 5090108 AT hekimian DOT com> <20020719050925 DOT GA24259 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You must be tired Chris, see comments below. Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > >(gdb) bt > >#0 0x77f67a1b in _system_dlls__ ()_NtFsControlFile AT 40 > >#1 0x77f686de in _system_dlls__ ()_RtlpValidateCurrentDirectory AT 4 > >#2 0x77f65df6 in _system_dlls__ ()_RtlGetFullPathName_Ustr AT 24 > >#3 0x77f658fe in _system_dlls__ ()_RtlDosPathNameToNtPathName_U AT 16 > >#4 0x77dc2f05 in _system_dlls__ ()_GetFileSecurityW AT 20 > >#5 0x77dc3018 in _system_dlls__ ()_GetFileSecurityA AT 20 > > Hmm. Interesting debug output. I don't recall ever seeing the > actual NT or win32 function names in gdb before. How did you manage > this? Another unpublished patch? > He said he hand edited to add them. > > > >The hang is on a dual-processor NT 4 machine running service pack 5. > > Service pack 5 of what W2K? > He said NT 4 sp5. Earnie.