Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:03:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: stat vs open w/ ".exe" Message-ID: <20020705170333.GD30783@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <03e001c22427$ce581a00$6132bc3e AT BABEL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03e001c22427$ce581a00$6132bc3e@BABEL> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:28:09PM +0100, Conrad Scott wrote: >I think this has been discussed before but I've searched the >mailing lists to no avail, so here goes. > >If you *stat* a file with no suffix, e.g. /bin/bash, it will >succeed if there is a file /bin/bash.exe. > >If you *open* a file with no suffix, it doesn't succeed in that >case. > >(So "ls /bin/bash" succeeds and "strings /bin/bash" fails.) > >In other words, stat(2) also checks for the file with a .exe >extension, while open(2) doesn't. The difference comes down to >the call to cygheap->fdtab.build_fhandler_from_name() in >syscalls.cc:_open() vs that in syscalls.cc:stat_worker(). > >Is this a bug or a deliberate decision? and if the latter, why so? It was a deliberate design decision. It *has* been discussed many times both in this group and in cygwin AT cygwin. I am not up to trying to recreate the argument (it wasn't mine) today. Maybe someone else will. cgf