Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:00:32 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Re[2]: vmstat Message-ID: <20020704160032.GB19440@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <00b901c21df9$1c9e3df0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <20020627163750 DOT GA27819 AT redhat DOT com> <010901c21dfa$de6d74e0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <3D1B5A59 DOT 7090609 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <024101c22216$d81624f0$0100a8c0 AT advent02> <103929877 DOT 20020704121327 AT syntrex DOT com> <00be01c22359$b9e7c170$0100a8c0 AT advent02> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00be01c22359$b9e7c170$0100a8c0@advent02> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 01:52:59PM +0100, Chris January wrote: >> Hello Chris, >> >> Wednesday, July 03, 2002, 12:21:42 AM, you wrote: >> >> CJ> Will this package actually appear on the mirrors in future or are >there >> CJ> issues I am not aware of preventing this from happening? >> >> Have you tried running the procps tools on current stock dll >> (1.3.12-1) ? For me most of them seem to just hang - top, procps, >> uptime, vmstat, w... havent tried the others. >> >> Maybe this problem corelates with the fact that some of the /proc >> files no longer contain information - see below: >> Perhaps it has to do something with your last patch. I don't have time >> to look at this right now though. I can send strace if you want. >> >> The procps tools I'm using were downloaded from your site following >> their anouncement on cygwin-apps. >This is caused by the default alignment changing from 4 bytes to 8 bytes, as >far as i can tell. Basically the size of structure passed to the NT system >calls is not the size of structure the call expects, so it fails and the >program (top, uptime, etc.) gets stuck in a loop trying to read data. >I did add macros to ntdll.h to make sure the structures were aligned >correctly, but then Chris changed the alignment back so I removed them. I >shall let Chris comment on this. Huh? What alignments have I changed? Pointers please. cgf