Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: <nhv AT cape DOT com>
From: "Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: has anyone run the test suite recently?
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 09:02:27 -0400
Message-ID: <002301c20323$4205a4c0$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <007601c20317$b09374a0$6132bc3e@BABEL>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Virus-Scanned: Cape.Com VirusScan, no known virus found

Conrad Scott writes:
>
>"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>> If anyone has the time, I'd be interested in seeing if there
>> are any regressions from 1.3.10 an the latest snapshot/cvs.
>>
>
>I did notice that if I compiled cygwin (i.e. the dll and so forth) with the
>current release (1.3.10-1) installed on my machine, I got a sequence of
>problems with the tests. But if I installed a newly built copy of cygwin
and
>*then* re-built and re-tested the same source tree, it all passed fine.
I'll
>try this again and preserve some log files.

I had similar results when running the regression test with a
locally built Cygwin < build date May 11 > installed, however
after copying the newly built cywin1.dll into /bin and rerunning
the regression test no unexpected errors were reported.

this is consistant with Conrad's findings

Cheers

Norman