Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:23:48 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Interesting pipe feature. Message-ID: <20020403142348.GD4053@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020402111635 DOT 02674130 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020402114010 DOT 024c9c90 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3CA9E355 DOT D5691839 AT yahoo DOT com> <20020402191300 DOT A24025 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3CAAEBF5 DOT 5C6530FC AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CAAEBF5.5C6530FC@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:48:05AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Duh!!! :) > >I thought I tried that. Actually, the sed script is 's#\\\\#/#g' or a >"char 9: Unknown option to 's'" is displayed. You know, this really doesn't sound like it has the slightest thing to do with cygwin1.dll. cgf >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 11:59:01AM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> > "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: >> > > >> > > OK, sorry. You're right. Interestingly enough, I don't have trouble >> > > running `echo $COMSPEC` directly on W2K, although your command sequence >> > > above also works. Do you have the same problem with `echo $COMSPEC` on >> > > XP? >> > > >> > >> > Yes, that's what I said. Hmm... Nothing like consistancy. >> >> `echo $COMSPEC | sed -e 's#\\\\#/#g#'` >> ^^^^ >> works great on XPprof