Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3C725405.4721927C@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:32:53 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Developers AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: wait_subproc failures in 2002-Feb-10 snapshot
References: <20020214172938 DOT GA1960 AT hp DOT com> <20020214172843 DOT GA1576 AT redhat DOT com> <20020217213708 DOT GC672 AT hp DOT com> <20020217223334 DOT GA17796 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:37:08PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:28:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 12:29:38PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
> >> >Any ideas of how to debug this further would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> I assume that this wasn't an issue with the previous snapshot?
> >
> >I rolled back to previous snapshots.  Both the 2002/1/25 and 2002/1/28
> >snapshot exhibit the following "sh.exe - Application Error":
> >
> >    The instruction at "0x610051b8" referenced memory at "0x0000b804".
> >    The memory could not be "read".
> >
> >The "sh.exe" mentioned above is the one started by fetchmail to run
> >procmail.
> >
> >Is there an easy way to map 0x610051b8 into a Cygwin DLL function name
> >without rebuilding the snapshot with debug information?
> 
> No.  Sorry.
> 

Hey, Chris, how about putting up the output of `objdump -Sl
new-cygwin1.dll' on the snapshots page?  Then it should be easy to
dereference the pointer to the source or am I missing something like
strip will move the pointers?

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com