Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: ok, the daemon has had feedback... Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:38:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020122035418.GA24302@redhat.com> > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Christopher > Faylor > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:47:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >which was: no impact when not running, broke tty's when running. > > > >I've fixed the tty issue.... so > > > >what next to get this accepted/further work required defined? > > Anyone actually looked at the changes and evaluated the implementation? > I haven't. I'll see what I can see, but I'm showing up a little late to that particular party ;-). > I'd hoped for a little bit more actual testing, too. > > Gary, are you using this on a day-to-day basis? > No, I'm not. In fact I have not tried Rob's tty fixes yet. I'll do so soon. Somebody should try this on WhyME/9x, the non-NT series seems to have the most trouble with... well, pretty much everything. Rob, is this branch synced with the current head, or does cvs make that difficult until you merge back in? -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot.