Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <064501c19c1a$4e2a6ad0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Gary R. Van Sickle" , "Cygwin-Developers" References: Subject: Re: Positive and negative results with cygserver.exe Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:08:52 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2002 10:08:47.0372 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A5C24C0:01C19C1A] Chris, Would you like more review? Specific things other than behaviour w/o the server running? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" > Running cygserver in a straight cmd window and "bash --login -i" in another, I > reran the build of the cygwin tree. Everything worked the same as it did with > 1.3.6-6 (i.e. successfully except for the install-bin issue, which I assume is a > branches-out-of-sync issue). Millions of "."s from cygserver, indicating that > it was in fact getting hit. > > Also ran without cygserver running but with the new cygwin1.dll. Everything > worked again. Noticed no speed difference: > > With cygserver running: > real 40m2.384s > user 17m20.654s > sys 12m26.704s > > Without: > real 42m31.088s > user 17m17.047s > sys 12m13.288s > > These times are comparable to what I was seeing with 1.3.6-6. Do you have CYGWIN=tty? Rob