Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: setup doco From: Robert Collins To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20011101215749.A7109@redhat.com> References: <1004669085 DOT 5558 DOT 36 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011101215749 DOT A7109 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Nov 2001 15:14:55 +1100 Message-Id: <1004674498.5402.74.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Nov 2001 04:19:13.0443 (UTC) FILETIME=[872E8F30:01C16355] On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 13:57, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 01:44:44PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > Also, if you want to change categories, for the most part, you just have > to edit setup.ini, currently. A few packages are controlled via > setup.hint, too, so those will have to be changed as well. I'm very much in favour of only ever editing the setup.hint files. This is a prelude to self contained packages, so that local installs can be a little more meaningful. > As I said in the cygwin mailing list, though, I don't think that > revamping the categories from the Debian structure (with the possible > exception of Required) makes much sense. It is your call, though. I don't favour altering the packages unless there is a clear benefit. I don't see one yet :]. Rob